RON logo

IndependentVerifiedTrusted

Home/Code of Ethics
Editorial Standards

Code of Ethics

RON exists to help readers understand what is actually happening. This code sets out the standards our newsroom holds itself to — and that readers are entitled to hold us to.

Last updated: 31 July 2026

Accuracy

We publish only what we can stand behind. Facts, names, figures, and quotations are checked before publication, not after. Where a claim cannot be verified to our standard, it does not run. When we get something wrong, we correct it openly — our Corrections Policy explains how.

Independence

Our coverage is not shaped by political affiliation, advertiser pressure, or any outside party with an interest in the outcome. Commercial relationships never determine whether a story runs, how it is framed, or whether it is taken down.

Fairness and balance
  • Where a story makes a serious allegation, we seek a response from those it concerns.
  • We represent opposing positions accurately, rather than in their weakest form.
  • We avoid framing that implies a conclusion the reporting does not support.
Sourcing

We identify our sources wherever we responsibly can, so readers can weigh the evidence for themselves. Anonymity is granted only where there is a genuine risk to a source and the information is in the public interest — never as a convenience. Material supplied by others is credited to whoever holds the rights to it, and readers can always tell our original reporting apart from news surfaced from other sources.

Accountability for what we publish

This code, and the editorial standards it describes, apply in full to the stories our own newsroom researches, writes, and publishes. Alongside that reporting, RON also surfaces news from other publishers and public sources, always credited to where it came from. We do not claim authorship of that material, and editorial responsibility for its accuracy sits with the outlet that originally published it.

Separating reporting from opinion

News reporting and commentary serve different purposes and are labelled so readers can tell them apart. Opinion pieces represent the view of their author, not a position of the publication.

Conflicts of interest

Members of our team do not report on matters in which they have a personal or financial stake. Where a connection exists that a reader might reasonably want to know about, we disclose it in the story rather than leave it unsaid.

Accountability

Editorial decisions are made by our desk, and our desk answers for them. Corrections are public, not quiet. If you believe we have fallen short of this code, tell us through the Contact Page and it will reach the editorial team.

Respect for readers

We do not chase outrage for engagement. Headlines reflect the story rather than a version of it engineered to provoke a click. We treat the people we report on — and the people who read us — as we would expect to be treated ourselves.

Privacy and harm

Public interest is the test for intruding on anyone's privacy, and we weigh it against the harm publication may cause. We take particular care in reporting on children, victims of crime, and those experiencing grief or trauma.